6 Responses to “Two Streetcar Articles In Business Press”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. JP

    Hopefully just an oversight in Poole’s remarks, but a TCU-area stop (as shown in the preliminary route plans) would be nice.

  2. JP,

    I think the TCU stops are considered part of the Near Southside loop for the purposes of planning and such. I would be very surprised if the TCU/Berry/Bluebonnet Circle stuff from the whitepaper had been removed.

  3. simeon

    With no right of ways how will this be any faster than a bus?

  4. AndyN

    The right-of-ways exist as public street right-of-ways. This mode is not supposed to be faster than a bus, it is a circulator not an express.

    Remember that this is a starter system and the route being studied in detail is supposed to have the greatest chance of being successful. The route to the stockyards and any extension to TCU are seen as future phases from what I have seen. These are excellent destinations, but there is only a finite amount of track that can be paid for with the initial project and these destinations are very far from downtown. Also keep in mind that TCU will receive a commuter rail station at Berry Street on the SW2NE line.

  5. Holden

    Is the Six Points UV in Riverside still included as a future route?

  6. JP

    I think you’ll still need a streetcar to get TCU people from that proposed rail station to the campus. (Although they could hop the #24 bus, I suppose.)

    That walk from Berry/Cleburne to Berry/University might not seem like much (less than 1 mile), but keep in mind that the University already has a fleet of shuttles (and even a city bus circulator) that move people shorter distances than that.