
With the Weekly’s Best of 2008 issue now out and about, I must confess – this one puzzles me. Of all the new architecture in Fort Worth, Cantey Hangar Plaza is the best?
I get that the Weekly will never get David M. Schwarz, because they do tend to skew pretty modernist in their architecture critique. Which is fine – I’m more than happy to take up the slack in promoting traditional architecture.
Though Schwarz’s new Carnegie Building in Sundance Square is turning out to be quite beautiful and is a great urban fabric building, and I’d be tempted to give the award to it. Anyway, putting aside that, I just can’t get behind Cantey Hangar as the recipient of any award.
The Weekly themselves describes the building as “confounding,” and as so confusing that “you’ll wonder where in hell the entrance is.” Both would seem to be points against the building in my point of view. Cantey Hangar’s not an especially bad building, but it’s not much of a contributor to the streetscape, either. It strikes me as dull as dishwater and completely unremarkable, though I do like the black bricks ringing its base. Its street interaction is basically the equivalent of the building going “meh.” There’s no real detail for the eye to enjoy as you pass by, and it’s not especially pleasant with its expanses of glass broken by plain concrete bands. I suppose it fits in between the just-short-of-cool 500 West 7th and the absolutely unredeemably terrible Burnett Plaza on either side of it, but I ask – why must new development around Burnett Park take the form of more concrete slabs? Inspiration ought to come instead from the gorgeous Electric Building, Neil P. Anderson Building, and U. S. Courthouse on the other side of the park. The area’s already overwhelmed with the deadening hand of modernism. Back in the ’60s, when 500 West 7th was the only modernist structure at the park and the Medical Arts Building was still standing, SOM’s office building would have been an interesting contrast. Now, Burnett Plaza smothers the place and traditional styles ought to be fighting back to retake the area from the concrete & glass boys.
But I digress. Another oddity – the Weekly remarks that Cantey Hangar has space for ground-level retail. I’m not sure that’s actually true – it was a subject of curiosity during the building’s construction and I never got a straight answer. If true, though, I find the next comment from the Weekly a little off-putting: “for what reason, we’ll never know.” I know the Weekly and I never see eye-to-eye on architecture, but I also know there are people there who know why urban buildings ought to have ground-level retail. There are plenty of reasons it should have ground-level retail from an urbanity standpoint.
So, yeah, Cantey Hangar seems an odd choice to me. Much better in my opinion is the Caceria Building, also a product of Gideon Toal (who designed Cantey Hangar), a beautiful little traditional-style structure nearly finished at 5th & Commerce. It faces the same problem as Schwarz’s buildings, though, in that the Weekly most likely wouldn’t go for its traditional design. If we’re limited to more modernist buildings, I’d have preferred to see the award go to One Museum Place at 7th & Bailey. One Museum Place is a lot more interesting to look at than Cantey Hangar, with its varied facades of glass, brick, and granite. It occupies a similarly odd-shaped lot but does so with more elegance and grace. And it’s got much better street interaction, with several friendly storefronts and a plaza out front.
Anthony? I know you’re reading this. Thoughts?
Recent Comments